Pipeline integrity management continues to evolve as inspection technology, engineering analysis and the quality of available asset data improve.
That evolution is now reflected in proposed federal regulation.
On July 8, 2026, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) proposed changes to the anomaly-response criteria for gas transmission and hazardous-liquid pipelines. PHMSA said advances in technology and engineering now allow operators to identify, evaluate, schedule and remediate pipeline anomalies more effectively than when many existing criteria were originally established. Comments on the proposal are due September 8, 2026.
One of the most important themes is a shift toward increasingly sophisticated, engineering-based evaluation.
Better Inspection Data Supports Better Integrity Decisions
PHMSA noted that modern inline inspection technology can detect a wider range of defects with greater accuracy than technologies available when the original integrity-management rules were developed.
The proposal would also add or clarify engineering methods for evaluating metal loss, cracks and dents. Among the methodologies referenced are API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Fitness-for-Service evaluations, fracture-mechanics models and more advanced engineering assessments.
For asset owners, the underlying message is important: inspection is not simply about finding indications.
It is about generating reliable information that can be evaluated, prioritized and converted into an appropriate maintenance or repair decision.
That requires quality inspection data, experienced personnel, defensible documentation and a clear understanding of the condition of the asset.
Risk-Based Inspection Is Receiving Attention Beyond Pipelines
PHMSA is also considering modernization of breakout-tank inspection requirements.
A separate June 2026 proposal would update the edition of API Standard 653 incorporated into federal breakout-tank regulations and would permit qualified risk-based inspection procedures to help establish internal inspection intervals. PHMSA cited improvements in inspection practices, risk assessment and repair requirements as part of the reasoning behind the proposal.
Together, these proposals reflect a broader direction in asset integrity: using better inspection technology and better engineering information to make more informed decisions about where risk exists and how it should be addressed.
Inspection That Produces Actionable Information
CATSI supports critical assets across the oil and gas, pipeline, chemical, metals and power industries through asset integrity, advanced NDE and technical inspection services. CATSI’s capabilities include mechanical integrity inspections involving API 653, API 510 and API 570, along with nondestructive testing, tanks and pressure vessels, piping, valves and other process equipment.
Its Advanced NDE capabilities include Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT), Automated Ultrasonic Testing and infrared inspection technologies designed to provide detailed information without disrupting the integrity of the component being evaluated.
As integrity programs become increasingly data-driven, the value of inspection is determined not simply by how much information is collected, but by whether that information can support confident decisions.
CATSI helps owners understand the condition of their critical assets so inspection data can become actionable insight.










